Show HN: OSS Agent I built topped the TerminalBench on Gemini-3-flash-preview
TL;DR Highlight
Dirac cuts API costs 64.8% and achieves 65.2% on TerminalBench-2 with efficient context management.
Who Should Read
Developers burdened by API costs when using AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cline, and Aider, or those looking to integrate agents into large-scale codebase refactoring projects.
Core Mechanics
- Dirac’s core philosophy stems from the well-known phenomenon that model inference ability degrades as context length increases. Maintaining a tight context improves both accuracy and cost.
- Optimizing Hash-Anchored Edits—a method of fixing code positions with hashes before modifying them—significantly reduces token waste during file editing. Unlike agents that read and write entire files, Dirac precisely targets only the necessary changes.
- By analyzing the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), the model only includes the code snippets it actually needs in the context. Instead of reading the entire large file, it selectively retrieves only the required functions or classes.
- Dirac processes large read/write operations in parallel. Unlike other agents that process tasks sequentially, it executes multiple file edits in batches, increasing speed and efficiency.
- The model can directly write and execute bash/python/perl scripts, then analyze the results. This dynamic information gathering contrasts with statically reading files.
- Dirac employs an 'opportunistic context update' strategy. It proactively populates the context with information the model is likely to request next, preventing unnecessary additional API calls.
- Using Gemini-3-flash-preview, Dirac scored 65.2% on the TerminalBench-2 leaderboard, achieving first place. This is 17 percentage points higher than Google’s official result, demonstrating that agent harness quality significantly impacts performance, even with the same model.
- Dirac does not use Model Context Protocol (MCP). While forked from Cline, it has evolved its own architecture and is released as open-source under the Apache 2.0 license.
Evidence
- "The most resonant comment in discussions is that the harness has a greater impact on performance than the model itself. One comment noted that changing the harness had a larger impact on benchmark scores than switching from Gemini to Sonnet, and many developers agreed. A user shared their experience refactoring a Rust codebase using Kimi 2.6 and Dirac, finding it more productive than OpenCode, which corrupted .rs files. Concerns were raised about telemetry, with a user discovering Dirac sending data to dirac.run/v1/event, potentially including sensitive API error content. The opt-out mechanism was criticized as untrustworthy. Some argued that context management is a temporary fix for current model limitations and may become obsolete with future generations, like RAG. The benchmark was limited to Gemini 3 Flash, raising concerns about overfitting and the need for validation on other model families (e.g., Minimax 2.7)."
How to Apply
- "If you’re experiencing excessive API costs with Cline or Aider, replace them with Dirac and compare costs and results. The claimed 64.8% cost reduction can be verified in your workflow. Dirac is well-suited for large-scale Rust/TypeScript codebase refactoring tasks, where context limits are easily reached, thanks to its AST-based context selection. If you use a company LLM proxy, a user reported successful connection with a few API/config file modifications. If telemetry is a concern, verify and disable the opt-out setting before use, especially in sensitive codebases where API errors could expose information."
Terminology
Related Papers
Show HN: adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Code
Claude Code에서 최대 7개의 병렬 서브 에이전트가 각각 다른 관점으로 PR을 리뷰하고, 자동 수정까지 해주는 오픈소스 플러그인이다. 기존 /review나 CodeRabbit보다 실제 버그를 더 많이 잡는다고 주장하지만 커뮤니티에서는 복잡도와 실효성에 대한 회의론도 나왔다.
How Fast Does Claude, Acting as a User Space IP Stack, Respond to Pings?
Claude Code에게 IP 패킷을 직접 파싱하고 ICMP echo reply를 구성하도록 시켜서 실제로 ping에 응답하게 만든 실험으로, 'Markdown이 곧 코드이고 LLM이 프로세서'라는 아이디어를 네트워크 스택 수준까지 밀어붙인 재미있는 사례다.
Show HN: Git for AI Agents
AI 코딩 에이전트(Claude Code 등)가 수행한 모든 툴 호출을 자동으로 추적하고, 어떤 프롬프트가 어느 코드 줄을 작성했는지 blame까지 가능한 버전 관리 도구다.
Principles for agent-native CLIs
AI 에이전트가 CLI 도구를 더 잘 사용할 수 있도록 설계하는 원칙들을 정리한 글로, 에이전트가 CLI를 도구로 활용하는 빈도가 높아지면서 이 설계 방식이 실용적으로 중요해지고 있다.
Agent-harness-kit scaffolding for multi-agent workflows (MCP, provider-agnostic)
여러 AI 에이전트가 서로 역할을 나눠 협업할 수 있도록 조율하는 scaffolding 도구로, Vite처럼 설정 없이 빠르게 멀티 에이전트 파이프라인을 구성할 수 있다.
Show HN: Tilde.run – Agent sandbox with a transactional, versioned filesystem
AI 에이전트가 실제 프로덕션 데이터를 건드려도 롤백할 수 있는 격리된 샌드박스 환경을 제공하는 도구로, GitHub/S3/Google Drive를 하나의 버전 관리 파일시스템으로 묶어준다.